MEA702 — Produce avionics engineering related graphics

Generate a complete, audit-ready assessment tool for this unit in minutes: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers, and a coverage matrix mapped to every component below. Reviewed and approved by your qualified person, exported under your branding.

Generate MEA702 free See a real sample

Every new account includes a free credit — no card, no subscription.

What an assessment for MEA702 must cover

70 assessable components: 3 elements (16 performance criteria), 7 performance evidence and 47 knowledge evidence requirements. An audit-defensible tool maps every question and task back to these — that mapping is the coverage matrix Auditori generates alongside the assessment.

Elements & performance criteria

1 Review the fundamentals of engineering graphics for avionic applications

1.1Review uses for avionic graphics
1.2Review engineering drawing standards
1.3Review graphical imaging or modelling techniques and conventions
1.4Review conventional representations of mechanical features and components, electrical, electronic and fluid control circuits
1.5Review computer-aided design (CAD) and other related software for currency and relevance
1.6Check and determine relevance of work health and safety (WHS) and regulatory requirements, codes of practice, risk assessment and registration requirements for graphical representation tasks
1.7Confirm the availability and features of a range of standards related to avionic system and component design, maintenance and modification
1.8Review typical criteria for avionic designs

2 Apply avionic graphics

2.1Determine engineering graphics required by avionic applications
2.2Apply relevant standards
2.3Represent avionic components and systems with sketching and computer graphical techniques, including orthogonal, three-dimensional imaging, wiring diagrams, circuit diagrams and system schematic drawings
2.4Determine and apply required dimensioning, tolerancing for limits and fits, surface finish, weld symbols, electrical, electronic and other required graphical convention information appropriate to avionic engineering applications
2.5Seek technical and professional assistance or clarification of design information as required
2.6Confirm final graphical representations with professional engineering staff and other stakeholders, including making any required adjustments
2.7Engage appropriate licensed technical and professional assistance for advice as required

3 Provide final drawings, files and documents

3.1Provide documentation, graphics, data files and clearances according to job requirements and enterprise drawing management system and procedures

Performance evidence

reviewing avionic engineering applications for required features, functions and context of avionic engineering graphics
developing orthographic, isometric and other 3-D graphical representations and techniques for mechanical, fluid, electrical and electronic system representation
representing avionic components and systems using sketching and computer graphics with regard to the following systems: electrical, instrument, radio, automatic flight and automatic engine control, data communications
representing avionic components and features using a comprehensive range of standard conventions and graphical techniques
representing a range of avionic systems using standard graphical representations for wiring, circuit and schematic diagrams
engaging appropriate technical and professional assistance for advice as required
reporting results of review and the application of graphics techniques and providing documentation, images and files according to job, regulatory and enterprise procedures.

Knowledge evidence

uses for graphics, such as:
design specifications
avionic maintenance procedures
modification orders and instructions
technical specifications and descriptions
physical arrangement of mechanical, fluid, electrical and electronic systems and components
diagrammatic layouts of electrical and electronic circuits
avionic system schematic diagrams
graphical representation techniques
role of WHS and regulatory requirements, codes of practice, risk assessment and registration requirements relevant to avionic applications
availability and features of standards related to avionic systems and component, design, maintenance and modification
typical criteria for avionic designs
sketching techniques
orthographic and 3-D representations
hole basis, shaft basis and keyway tolerances and fits
dimensioning conventions
representing avionic components and systems using sketching and computer graphics
standard conventions and graphical techniques as specified in standards, such as those listed in the Range of Conditions:
hole basis, shaft basis and keyway tolerances and fits
dimensioning, tolerancing for limits and fits
surface finish
weld symbols
webs, cross sections and cutting planes
chain drives, gear sets, pulley and belt drives
threads, fasteners and springs
shafts, keyways and splines
structural sections
surface finishes and welds
webs, cross sections, cutting planes
electric motors and electrically operated fluid power actuators
electrical, electronic, electro fluid (hydraulic and pneumatic) controls
electrical and electronic circuit components
representations of avionic systems and components, including:
construction of artwork for printed circuit boards
aircraft electrical power generation and distribution
control and indication for mechanical, fluid power and flight control systems
aircraft instrument systems
radio communication and navigation
pulse
automatic flight and automatic engine control
data communications, including in-flight entertainment
current and traditional methods of documentation generation and control:
computer library files compared to the use of reference charts and catalogue information
generation of orthogonal images from models
manual drawing
future developments in graphics and related engineering software
worksite procedures and regulatory requirements for the processing and filing of graphics, specifications and operating and maintenance instructions/manuals, including CM and ILS requirements.

Unit content sourced from training.gov.au — © Commonwealth of Australia, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Auditori is not affiliated with the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations.

See what you get before you start

Real, unedited Auditori output (RIIHAN201E shown), branded for a sample RTO:

Questions about assessing MEA702

What does an assessment tool for MEA702 need to cover?

To satisfy the Principles of Assessment and Rules of Evidence, an assessment for MEA702 needs to address all 70 unit components: 3 elements with 16 performance criteria, 7 performance evidence requirements, 47 knowledge evidence requirements, and the foundation skills. A coverage matrix mapping each question and task to these components is what an auditor looks for.

How does Auditori generate an assessment tool for MEA702?

Auditori pulls the current release of MEA702 from training.gov.au and generates a complete package: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers and observation criteria, and a coverage matrix mapping every component. A suitably qualified person then reviews and approves the draft in a built-in workflow — consistent with ASQA's guidance on AI use in VET — before export as branded PDF and editable Word.

Is the first assessment tool really free?

Yes. Every new account includes one free credit — enough to generate the complete assessment tool for MEA702 — with no card and no subscription required. After that it's pay-as-you-go per unit.

Can I check my existing MEA702 assessment instead of generating a new one?

Yes — upload your existing assessment or learner guide and Auditori maps it against every element, performance criterion, PE and KE of MEA702, showing exactly what's covered and what's missing. Mapping costs a quarter of a credit.

Related units

Your MEA702 assessment tool, in minutes.

First unit free. No card, no RTO registration, no subscription.

Generate MEA702 free