MSL975055Classify building sites

Generate a complete, audit-ready assessment tool for this unit in minutes: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers, and a coverage matrix mapped to every component below. Reviewed and approved by your qualified person, exported under your branding.

Every new account includes a free credit — no card, no subscription.

What an assessment for MSL975055 must cover

37 assessable components: 4 elements (21 performance criteria), 1 performance evidence and 13 knowledge evidence requirements, plus 2 foundation skills. An audit-defensible tool maps every question and task back to these — that mapping is the coverage matrix Auditori generates alongside the assessment.

Elements & performance criteria

1 Prepare to classify site

  • 1.1Review job request and any accompanying documentation to identify purpose of site classification, proposed structure, client’s information needs and timeframe
  • 1.2Review relevant building codes or regulations, standards and workplace procedures for classifying site
  • 1.3Locate any previous site classifications conducted in same area
  • 1.4Review supplied site drawings, topography, borehole locations and logs, photographs and design plans for planned structure
  • 1.5Inspect supplied samples and investigation data for completeness and obvious errors
  • 1.6Confirm that investigation data meets depth requirements for the type of site and location
  • 1.7Liaise with client when supplied documentation, samples, investigation data and/or job request do not comply with workplace procedures and resolve any problems

2 Analyse site information and test results

  • 2.1Locate and assess site features, such as slope, structures, drainage, trees and vegetation or abnormal soil conditions that may affect site classification
  • 2.2Determine if fill is present on-site, whether controlled or uncontrolled, and its depth and extent
  • 2.3Determine bearing capacity of soil
  • 2.4Review shrink/swell or correlated clay index test results to determine soil reactivity
  • 2.5Review bore log data in conjunction with soil reactivity and calculate potential soil movement
  • 2.6Recognise obvious errors, insufficient or inconsistent data and limitations of test results
  • 2.7Arrange for, or conduct, additional sampling and/or testing to ensure reliable data for site classification, as required

3 Report site classification

  • 3.1Use standard symbols and descriptors to assign a valid site classification that accurately reflects soil reactivity, surface movement and any problematic features
  • 3.2Summarise field observations, calculations and test results used to determine site classification
  • 3.3Accurately describe site features that will affect the design of the proposed structure
  • 3.4Provide adequate data to inform footing system design
  • 3.5Authorise release of site classification report to the client, or forward the report to a signatory for review and release

4 Finalise site classification

  • 4.1Store client’s documentation, samples and test data, and site classification in accordance with workplace procedures
  • 4.2Maintain confidentiality of client information

Performance evidence

  • safely conducted at least 5 site classifications from the following list of Australian Standard site classes: S, M, H1, H2, E and P.

Knowledge evidence

  • importance of ethical/professional conduct of site classifications and legal implications of errors
  • Australian and international standards and guidelines covering the requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, laboratory safety, and quality and environmental management and: State/Territory Building Codes and Regulations, AS 2870-2011 Residential slabs and footings, AS 3798-2007 Guidelines on earthworks for commercial and residential developments, AS 1726-2017 Geotechnical site investigations, AS 1289 Set Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes, National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) documents regarding construction materials testing (Field application document)
  • engineering properties of soil and rock materials
  • information required for footing system design
  • methods of assigning a site classification
  • influences of topography, site preparation, structures and vegetation on classification decisions
  • in situ and laboratory test methods applicable to site classification
  • common calculations (e.g. surface movement) used in site classification
  • common sources of site misclassification, including: misidentification of soil properties, non-recognition of fill or nature of fill, laboratory test results inconsistent with site observations and/or bore logs
  • principles and purpose of test methods implemented (why they are used and what they demonstrate)
  • technological advances that include automation
  • awareness of environmental sustainability issues as they relate to the work task
  • legal, ethical and work health and safety (WHS) requirements specific to the work task including traceability, confidentiality and security requirements of all client information, and laboratory data and records.

Foundation skills

  • Learning skills: to recognise soil characteristics and accurately classifying samples of gravel, sand, silt and clay
  • Numeracy skills: to: compare the physical properties of samples with test results and expected values and recognising anomalous results; perform accurate calculations, such as surface movement.

Unit content sourced from training.gov.au — © Commonwealth of Australia, licensed under CC BY 4.0. Auditori is not affiliated with the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations.

See what you get before you start

Real, unedited Auditori output (RIIHAN201E shown), branded for a sample RTO:

Questions about assessing MSL975055

What does an assessment tool for MSL975055 need to cover?

To satisfy the Principles of Assessment and Rules of Evidence, an assessment for MSL975055 needs to address all 37 unit components: 4 elements with 21 performance criteria, 1 performance evidence requirements, 13 knowledge evidence requirements, and the foundation skills. A coverage matrix mapping each question and task to these components is what an auditor looks for.

How does Auditori generate an assessment tool for MSL975055?

Auditori pulls the current release of MSL975055 from training.gov.au and generates a complete package: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers and observation criteria, and a coverage matrix mapping every component. A suitably qualified person then reviews and approves the draft in a built-in workflow — consistent with ASQA's guidance on AI use in VET — before export as branded PDF and editable Word.

Is the first assessment tool really free?

Yes. Every new account includes one free credit — enough to generate the complete assessment tool for MSL975055 — with no card and no subscription required. After that it's pay-as-you-go per unit.

Can I check my existing MSL975055 assessment instead of generating a new one?

Yes — upload your existing assessment or learner guide and Auditori maps it against every element, performance criterion, PE and KE of MSL975055, showing exactly what's covered and what's missing. Mapping costs a quarter of a credit.

Related units

Your MSL975055 assessment tool, in minutes.

First unit free. No card, no RTO registration, no subscription.

Generate MSL975055 free