AURETB002 — Analyse and evaluate electrical and electronic faults in dynamic control management systems

1 Identify and confirm the work requirement

• 1.1Objective of the analysis and evaluation is determined from workplace instructions
• 1.2Specifications for dynamic control management system are sourced and interpreted
• 1.3System faults, deficiencies or discrepancies are identified and confirmed
• 1.4Hazards associated with the work are identified and risks are managed according to workplace procedures and safety requirements

2 Prepare for analysis and evaluation

• 2.1Evaluation criteria are developed or adopted to meet the objective of the analysis and evaluation
• 2.2Analytical and evaluative methodology is developed or identified from technical information
• 2.3Testing equipment is prepared according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
• 2.4Tools and materials required to support the diagnostic procedure are identified, selected and prepared for use
• 2.5Dynamic control management system and components are prepared for the diagnostic process

3 Carry out failure analysis

• 3.1Selected analytical and evaluative methodology is followed according to manufacturer specifications and workplace procedures
• 3.2Tests are carried out according to manufacturer specifications, workplace procedures, and safety and environmental requirements
• 3.3Analytical and other diagnostic findings are verified, as required, by using reliable alternative or optional processes
• 3.4Analytical findings and results are assessed against evaluation criteria
• 3.5Valid conclusions are drawn from available evidence and documented according to workplace requirements

4 Make recommendations

• 4.1Options for responding to the objective are determined from further research of technical support information
• 4.2Rectification method is selected from an analysis of the options, operating conditions, regulatory requirements, Australian Design Rules, and financial implications
• 4.3Report is prepared specifying analysis and evaluation process, and detailing and justifying rectification method or variation to the rectification method

5 Complete work processes

• 5.1Final inspection is made to ensure work is to workplace expectations
• 5.2Work area is cleaned, waste and non-recyclable materials are disposed of, and recyclable material is collected
• 5.3Tools and equipment are checked and stored, and any faulty electrical equipment is identified, tagged and isolated according to workplace procedures
• 5.4Workplace documentation is processed according to workplace procedures

What does an assessment tool for AURETB002 need to cover?

To satisfy the Principles of Assessment and Rules of Evidence, an assessment for AURETB002 needs to address all 39 unit components: 5 elements with 21 performance criteria, 2 performance evidence requirements, 10 knowledge evidence requirements, and the foundation skills. A coverage matrix mapping each question and task to these components is what an auditor looks for.

How does Auditori generate an assessment tool for AURETB002?

Auditori pulls the current release of AURETB002 from training.gov.au and generates a complete package: candidate assessment, assessor guide with model answers and observation criteria, and a coverage matrix mapping every component. A suitably qualified person then reviews and approves the draft in a built-in workflow — consistent with ASQA's guidance on AI use in VET — before export as branded PDF and editable Word.

Is the first assessment tool really free?

Yes. Every new account includes one free credit — enough to generate the complete assessment tool for AURETB002 — with no card and no subscription required. After that it's pay-as-you-go per unit.

Can I check my existing AURETB002 assessment instead of generating a new one?

Yes — upload your existing assessment or learner guide and Auditori maps it against every element, performance criterion, PE and KE of AURETB002, showing exactly what's covered and what's missing. Mapping costs a quarter of a credit.